Author - Ayush Raghav
Student - Sharda University, Noida
 |
| Download Research Paper - Pdf |
ABSTRACT
Under Section 151 of The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr PC) preventive detention is action taken on grounds of suspicion that some wrong actions may be done by the person concerned. A police officer can arrest an individual without orders from a Magistrate and without any warrant if he gets any information that such an individual can commit any offense. Article 22 of the Indian Constitution provides protection against arrest and detention in certain cases. This paper deals with the various laws regarding the preventive detention in India. The historical perspective and constitutional validity of the preventive detention is discussed in this paper including the landmark judgements that helps to understand the topic and gives a clear view of the law.
Under Section 151 of The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr PC) preventive detention is action taken on grounds of suspicion that some wrong actions may be done by the person concerned. A police officer can arrest an individual without orders from a Magistrate and without any warrant if he gets any information that such an individual can commit any offense. Article 22 of the Indian Constitution provides protection against arrest and detention in certain cases. This paper deals with the various laws regarding the preventive detention in India. The historical perspective and constitutional validity of the preventive detention is discussed in this paper including the landmark judgements that helps to understand the topic and gives a clear view of the law.
 |
| Download Research Paper - Pdf |
Lex Explore
Website - https://www.lexexplore.online/
Accessibility - Open Access
Submit Manuscript - Click Here
Licensing - All research papers published in Lex Explore are open acess. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer - The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions of the Lex Explore or its members.
